The less of two evils

The marketing of Hillary as the less of two evils against Donald Trump was wrong, and proves it with the wining of the actual president; just because in politics the worst is the right and ever win, due the many twisted interests involved on the struggle. Hillary were the less of two evils in 2004, when she contends with an unknown senator called Barack Obama; and at that time she lost just because that, Obama were actually the wors of two real evils. The problem with this is the twisted rationality of politics, which invert and act as a mirror to reality; and that’s nothing strange, since appealing to the lower instinct of humans, politics turn them against their own good. It could look otherwise, but if politics were aimed to the wellness of people, why the use of empty rhetoric and fake populism?

At the 2004 elections Obama show himself as the worst of two evils, because his campaign was not based in positivity; it doesn’t even try to appeal to a positive message besides the empty rhetoric of “Change, we can”, which becomes the biggest scam on history. But he flattens the powers at the backstage with the possibility of a moral base, like the progressiveness implied in a first black president; worse than that, a first black president who will never attend to problems of the black community, but who will cover with his black skin the wrongdoing of the white elites. That’s so bad that need to be good in politics, and it worked. Actually, Obama was so divisive that he may have be who bring Trump to the political stage; at that time when he was so immature that could not bear the arrogance of Trump, a white rich but not so powerful as the powers that put him on the stage.

At that time, Hillary were the lesser of two evils, because she was bad but not so divisive as a white woman; in fact, as a white woman she could be ignored but not heated as Obama, and it was about the country, not the individual. You can still understand the dilemma, with Hillary the country could have solve the problems inherited from the Busch administration; not because the charisma she absolutely lacks, but because she was a real compromise between that powers behind the stage and that’s what matter. That was not the case of Obama, who not only infatuated the basis of the party, but also that powers behind the stage; actually, Obama may have infatuated himself, if you look to the security he displays about problems he barely manages. As a proof, the battle play with Trump, in which he punches the actual president because his dumbness; he even laughs at the pretention of Trump to becomes president, which were a bit too much but not too too much…